After watching the video “The Web Will Die When OOPs dies” and reading a few hip articles, on “how to improve your code,” gave me an idea. If someone is writing to give advice on improvements they should provide real world examples to why their suggestions/fixes to a language/framework are necessary.

Instead of articles of “Top 10 ways to improve your code;” I’d rather see an article about how something was improved. Take small segments from your own application or an open source project and write up a small report on how your suggestion[s] improved it. If you’re writing an article for developers, we’re interested in the proof and technical content. If your suggestions didn’t work out, we’re still interested in the story about the journey, or the technical observations that you found. Making vague suggestions and recommendations (without evidence) bore a technical audience. When you make vague suggestions to someone, you’re making an statement that you know more about their work or problem than they do. Your audience should be intelligent, if not then still write for an intelligent audience. Vague statements don’t address interesting problems, or new approaches.

So going back to the video I mentioned earlier. I like his tactless approach. He’s taken a good deal of experience from web development and he is presenting his argument. He doesn’t attempt to ask for others for opinion, nor does he attempt to tell his audience how to do their job. He just merely presents issues that he found, and his way of trying to solve those. The last thing that I loved about his talk is that he never once tried to push the latest hip language or framework. He mentioned a few frameworks, and then made a critism.